Sideshow Toy's recent flurry of Toy Fair 2002 product announcements have
stirred up a lot of excitement for what's in store. Not only are they planning
to release figures from Hogan's Heroes and the James Bond flicks, but they're
also delving into an historic era of swords line, as well as continuing
with their "Monty Python and the Holy Grail" line. I was intrigued last
year when Sideshow Toy announced their figures from the Monty Python "Holy
Grail" flick: Not because of the Monty Python angle, but because of the
medieval angle (Hey I like their comedy, but not to the point where I do
their routines in public places... Nih!). Collectors' choices have been
few for figures of that genre: Cotswold and Marx Toys... (Resaurus (R.I.P.)
was gonna do an intricate Italian knight once upon a time, but backed out
after some bottom-line analysis I suspect.) Cotswold's stuff is incredible--
handmade real metal armour, but at a couple hundred bucks it's not affordable
for many collectors (like me--too many other things to buy...). The Marx
Toys plastic knights are nicely detailed, loaded with tons of pieces and
weapons, and reasonably priced. My disappointment would be that they've
got just one "model" that they reissue in different colors. Another option--
making your own knight --is probably more work than most folks would want
to do. So Sideshow Toy added to the variety-- even if it isn't plate armour--
at an Everyman's price.
Well, sort of... One of the reasons I didn't order the figures when
they were announced was that they were only available for preordering
in sets-- all five figures for around $150. I'm wary of preordering anything,
and I sure wasn't going to sink that much money into five figures I hadn't
seen in person. If you decide you don't like their approach, you've got
five examples of it, a thinner wallet, and less real estate. I wasn't
convinced that they could pull it off, despite how their pictures looked.
Fortunately, that seems to have changed and places like Sun Coast Video
and War Toys (now out of stock) sold
the figures individually. But they're not the easiest figures to find.
I bought three to satisfy my curiosity: King Arthur, Sir Galahad, and
Sir Bedevere (Though I intended to get only two, Arthur wasn't available
at the time). So the number of figures which I bought was three and three
was the number of figures which I bought. Not two or four, but three.
No more, no less. (Although two was the number of figures which I had
intended to buy.) Yeah, yeah...
A big challenge in the production of a medieval figure is how to render the
chainmail convincingly. Obviously, no toymaker hoping to sell ten thousand units
quickly is going to use real handmade chainmail. That stuff is expensive-- I
suspect that it can't be made by machine in the same way that fabric can be
woven. A single butcher's glove can cost close to a hundred bucks, which can
buy you a whole lot of shrubbery. Even with real chainmail, the scale difference
takes some suspension of belief; the smallest links I've seen were on a tiny
turn-of-the-century handmade Italian purse that cost $2000+ (for gold), and
you'd have a hard time justifying hacking that up for a custom figure.
But metal is metal-- it has a distinctive look and drape. When you simulate
it with foil woven fabrics, you run the risk of creating malodorous fromage,
which requires a more radical kind of suspension of disbelief and pinching your
nostrils tightly closed.
Actually, Sideshow Toy's is pretty good. The weave is a much better simulation
of it than what BBI used in their figure, "Shadow". Its texture detail
is similar to the loose woven polishing cloth that I thought was a fair
approximation in some of my medieval customizing efforts. The big difference
is the shiny foil, which creates a high contrast with the black stretchy
fabric it's woven into. Together, they create the illusion of scale detail--
tiny shiny things and the black shadowy stuff in between. It's not entirely
convincing though: It's an exaggerated stylized representation, a blunt
indicator that this novelty fabric isn't just regular fabric. Real chainmail
wouldn't be quite so uniform, bright, clean and shiny. Not surprisingly,
the drape isn't very realistic either. For the arms and legs, it's not
a big deal, but the coif and shoulders piece looks kinda strange with
the maile not reacting properly to gravity. To be fair, it's actually
a moot point-- I don't think Monty Python used real chainmail in their
costuming anyway (except Arthur's coif), so Sideshow Toy's version
is probably as accurate as it needs to be. Anyway, the chainmail is a
2-piece suit: pants with feet and a pullover top. Unfortunately, only
the arms of the top are made of the faux chainmail and the body is made
of a plain gray stretchy material. This was probably done to save money,
but you can't rule out the possibility that it may be startlingly faithful
to the movie.
The
rest of the costuming is typically Sideshow Toy. Generally, the cloth
goods on the figures I own (Frankie, Buffy, Spinal Tap and these) are
adequate, but not too exciting. There's some reuse of items in these figure
which saves Sideshow Toy some money (and again, is probably accurate for
the movie's costuming-- the movie wasn't a high-budget production). The
outer sheet-like smock is decorated with a printed pattern; the belt assembly
is two belts fixed together: the fabric one cinches to the waist and the
leatherette one holds the sword sheath lower on the hip. Simple plastic
elbow armour attaches with elastic. The swords and shields are good, but
unremarkable. As with most of their figures, certain accessories receive
special treatment. Sir Galahad's lantern has a metal handle and opens;
Sir Bedevere comes with the witch counterweight duck and King Arthur comes
with the Holy Hand Grenade. The gloves are also very well done and the
figures have different sculpts-- I don't know if that extends though the
entire series though, but it's true for three of three. Sideshow Toy's
strong suit is their excellent sculpting talent and their collection of
licensed properties, both of which come together in the headsculpt. They
consistently produce some of the best likenesses of media personalities,
right down to their characteristic expressions. Of the three mentioned,
Sir Galahad (Michael Palin) is the weakest likeness and has a goofy expression
to boot. All in all, despite the middle-of-the-road quality, these are
solid representations of the gang from that meandering and quirky movie,
"Monty Python and the Holy Grail".
Most call it "kitbashing" but I think of it as redressing injustices...
Post Review Thoughts: With the product review done, I'd like to present
some pointed observations and whinings of a more general nature, from the
perspective of hands-on Joehead-- the kind of hobbyist who wishes all boxes
were ugly so you didn't feel as guilty when you squashed and tossed 'em,
and prefers that a figure be able to stand standless on it's own two Made-In-China
feet.
Sideshow Toy occupies a special niche in this hobby. This comes from
the type of figure they make, and from their background as a mass market
producer who withdrew their 1:6 scale stuff after a brief stint in TRU.
Their 1:6 stuff is now marketed as a special collectible, and appears
to be doing very well. It's announced, available for preorder and distributed
in limited quantities through online stores and specialty shops. When
they first announced this change and presented it as a good thing for
us, a lot of Joeheads howled. Perhaps they didn't know us very
well? More likely, it was to put a better spin on a marketing necessity.
1:6 scale figures are expensive and the mass market doesn't support production
of an endless variety in that figure format.
We all know that the magic aura of a self-christened "collectible" is
pretty vaporous-- it's an effective marketing tool to stimulate demand.
Unfortunately, in this case the "collectible" tag doesn't add anything
special to the product to differentiate it, quality-wise, from what's
available in other mass-market figure lines. It just indicates eclectic
subject matter and small production runs. Stripped of the hype and the
specific subject matter, the features and quality are pretty unremarkable
and much like what you find on the shelves at TRU, where you'll also find
other things that call themselves "collectible". Sure, they
didn't invent this strategy and aren't the only ones doing it,
but it contrasts with the effort that some other companies put into their
figures to take advantage of distribution outside the mainstream. Those
companies produce figures which are less appropriate for the mass market--
a higher price point, fragile detail, high part counts, and taboo things
like SS-runes and risque themes. These confer a genuine collectibility
which is independent of artificial limited availability. That's not to
say that those companies don't play the collectibility game too or produce
a few lowball figures, but the overall cachet of collectibility seems
more deserved in their cases. It seems that there are companies which
distribute this way because they have to, and companies which live with
that but take advantage of the possibilities that this market offers.
Sideshow
Toy is well known for doing a fabulous job of turning media characters
into 1:6 figures. This is something a lot of Joeheads have wanted for
a long time. While this isn't a new concept, Sideshow Toy's products have
a unique feel, like a melding of two hobbies: garage kits and dolls. This
probably has something to do with their garage kit connection-- Tom Gilliland
(who I believe is their big honcho project designer) is well known in
the world of garage kits for his mastery of the art. Most of the time
this fusion works very well, but there are a few cases where the traditions
of these two hobbies don't live well together. Garage kits are sculptures--static
models whose fixed poses and expressions work together to recreate a scene;
a frozen moment in time. Dolls are a more generic representation of the
human figure; they're poseable so they can fit a wide variety of scenes.
Putting a head with a frozen-in-time, single-use expression on a doll
limits the types of situations where it can be posed convincingly. I think
this is the feeling which many Joeheads express about 21C's Jacqueline
figure's outstretched hand. It's a specialty pose which doesn't look appropriate
in many situations. Sir Galahad has one of those goofy smiling faces which
looks best in a group publicity photo. While very well sculpted, I can't
see using it anywhere in my collection. The same goes for some of the
Spinal Tap figures-- they look cool frozen in time as Spinal Tap. Period.
I think most box-opening Joeheads prefer a little more versatility from
figures. When I want statues frozen in action poses, I buy garage kits
or smaller format figures. Apparently, Sideshow Toy doesn't fully understand
the hands-on, kit-bashin' Joehead mentality. Or maybe they do, but have
a different focus?
The reality is, Sideshow Toy's target consumer isn't the kitbashing Joehead:
The media fan is. The figures look great, capture the essence of the characters
they represent, are reasonably priced and probably satisfy most fans.
They're marketed as collectibles and fans of the shows lap it up. Of course
Joeheads benefit from this-- they're kewl-looking 1:6 figures and there's
some kitbash potential (though not as much as there could be). Realistically,
the line between fan and Joehead isn't that sharp... we're probably a
bit of both. But as a picky aficionado of the 1:6 scale figure, I look
for more than the facade of how well they represent the movie characters--
I appreciate quality and mixed media detail and am willing to plunk down
extra bucks for it. Some reasonable improvements which would have made
me happier: Sir Bedevere with a removeable helmet; Arthur with a removeable
crown; A full coif for Sir Galahad. To market to fans comfortable with
the all-in-one construction of smaller format action figures, Sideshow
Toy didn't need to spend money on this, so they didn't. It does make you
wonder how they'd approach producing a knight with plate armour... molded
on armor? That seems to be a growing trend for 1:6 scale manufacturers--
we're seeing more figures with headsculpts that have masks and headgear
molded on. Ostensibly, the benefit is a more "realistic" sculpture-centered
figure (which happen to be cheaper to produce). Personally, I think this
isn't as interesting as the traditional mixed media doll with removeable
outfits. (Hasbro may have started this with their HOF Snake Eyes figure,
and maybe 21C deserves the blame for propagating this, with their solid
molded backpacks.) The times they are a-changin'... But I'd sure hate
to see this trend overtake what has traditionally been one of the really
neat and defining features of 12" dolls.
Finally, I should mention that one of the reasons I wanted these figures
was to update my impressions of Sideshow Toy's base figure: I'd heard
they'd improved them, and they seem to be proud enough of them to plan
selling them buck-naked as artist's mannequins. When I got my first Sideshow
Toy figure, I was gushingly enthusiastic and willing to overlook my Frankie's
out-of-the-box busted waist as a rare fluke. As I acquired more of their
figures, I became more disappointed about the quality and design of the
figure. Acquiring a second one with this out-of-the-box affiction and
unintentionally causing a third one to follow that path soured my assessment;
this happened in conjunction with finding loose rotation joints and ankles,
with the attendent difficulties in making the bastards stand. I
think the glitz of all the articulation blinds some folks to the dirt:
I'm sorry to say, but based on what I know about figures, these are not
close to being the ideal figure... and that hasn't changed with my updated
impression from these figures. It may seem like a quality control issue,
but the figure's design may aggravate the QC problem. Without putting
them through anything approaching a rigorous test, the Arthur figure came
out-of-the-box with a floppy right arm at the shoulder joint. After removing
Galahad's outfit and moving his right ankle a few times, it became noticibly
looser than the left one. And then there are all those too-loose rotation
joints. QC might not catch things like this because they're not outright
broken-- as in, broken in pieces. They're just broken in functionality.
I must say that this contrasts radically with the designing and engineering
which has gone into the giant "Men of Honor" figure that I'm currently
working on. Even though that's a much bigger figure with far less articulation,
it was designed with lots of thought to the figure maintaining tight joints.
I consider this kind of unseen quality to be very important, but the casual
figure collector might not. And if your goal is to manufacture an affordable
product for people who will probably display them in the box or impale
them on stands, things like that don't matter much. They're mainly collectibles,
right?